Date:Sunday May 6 2007
Sky Sports reports that the Premier League has confirmed neither Manchester United nor Everton have broken any rules regarding Tim Howard's transfer.
Howard joined Everton on a season-long loan deal last summer, before the move became permanent in February.
Questions were raised over the transfer when Howard did not feature against United in the recent clash between the two sides at Goodison Park.
The League contacted the two clubs to find out why the American goalkeeper was not involved as it would not have allowed the deal to be made permanent if United had requested a clause preventing Howard from playing against them.
However, after investigating the matter the League has cleared both clubs of any wrongdoing.
A statement from the Premier League said: 'At the time of Tim Howard's permanent transfer from Manchester United to Everton, the Premier League ensured there were no agreements in place that contravened our rules.
'As a result of recent comments we had sought further clarification from both clubs and are satisfied that it remains the case that there were no agreements that breached any of our rules.
'Everton were free to play Tim Howard in their fixture against Manchester United had they so wished - and this has been confirmed by both clubs.'
Then my question would be, 'Why didn`t they play Tim Howard`
He wasn`t injured, he was their regular goalkeeper through out the season playing 37 times so far and he was in fine form.
There has been some strange goings on this season, with all the money that is at stake, both for staying in and for being successful in the Premier League, clubs need to be above suspicion.
The rules on loaned players not being able to play against their 'real` club is an area that is open to miss use.
I`m not saying that there is any wrong doing on the part of Manchester United, but the fact that they have loaned out TWO goalkeepers this season, Tim Howard to Everton and Ben Foster to Watford, who were both regulars for their respective clubs, meant that when they faced Manchester United they did so without their regular goalkeepers.
It just seems a little bizarre; maybe the way forward is to stop clubs from the same division from loaning clubs to each other.
Have your say on the 'Latics Speyk` message board
Vital Wigan is back, so why not join up and join in?
Message Board We also need your help in the forum, so join up and kick off the debate, or if you have a forum at the moment, why not enquire about merging with Vital and get free hosting + an income? To visit the message board, click here. Get involved
This website is your website and we are looking for people to help run the site. Do you go to most of the games and have an opinion? Why not write a match report? Perhaps you are a budding journalist or even just someone who is very opinionated? Well why not join our team? If this interests you please contact Vital Wigan.
Date:Sunday May 6 2007
What The Bosses Said - Latics 1 Rotherham 2 (Sunday December 21 2014)
To Me To You - Latics 1 Rotherham 2 (Sunday December 21 2014)
Football Truce? What Was Going On! (Sunday December 21 2014)
Stats: Wigan Athletic v Rotherham United (Saturday December 20 2014)
R.C.G. Are Backing Wigan Athletic (Saturday December 20 2014)
Latics v Rotherham - Big Game Preview (Saturday December 20 2014)
Malky Mackay Speaks About The 'Football Truce' (Friday December 19 2014)
What The Bosses Say - Latics v Rotherham United (Friday December 19 2014)
Early Team News - Latics v Rotherham United (Friday December 19 2014)
The 12th Man - Jingle Bells To That (Friday December 19 2014)
|18. Leeds Utd||22||6||6||10||-7||24|
|Lack Of Consistency Frustrates Slade
» Cardiff : 21/12/2014 19:26:00
|Bent Loves Being A Seagull
» Brighton : 21/12/2014 18:25:00
|What The Bosses Said - Latics 1 Rotherham 2
» Wigan : 21/12/2014 18:22:00
|Hyypia - We Deserved Wolves Victory
» Brighton : 21/12/2014 18:20:00
|Blackpool In The Press For Wrong Reasons Again
» Blackpool : 21/12/2014 18:04:00