Date:Sunday May 6 2007
Sky Sports reports that the Premier League has confirmed neither Manchester United nor Everton have broken any rules regarding Tim Howard's transfer.
Howard joined Everton on a season-long loan deal last summer, before the move became permanent in February.
Questions were raised over the transfer when Howard did not feature against United in the recent clash between the two sides at Goodison Park.
The League contacted the two clubs to find out why the American goalkeeper was not involved as it would not have allowed the deal to be made permanent if United had requested a clause preventing Howard from playing against them.
However, after investigating the matter the League has cleared both clubs of any wrongdoing.
A statement from the Premier League said: 'At the time of Tim Howard's permanent transfer from Manchester United to Everton, the Premier League ensured there were no agreements in place that contravened our rules.
'As a result of recent comments we had sought further clarification from both clubs and are satisfied that it remains the case that there were no agreements that breached any of our rules.
'Everton were free to play Tim Howard in their fixture against Manchester United had they so wished - and this has been confirmed by both clubs.'
Then my question would be, 'Why didn`t they play Tim Howard`
He wasn`t injured, he was their regular goalkeeper through out the season playing 37 times so far and he was in fine form.
There has been some strange goings on this season, with all the money that is at stake, both for staying in and for being successful in the Premier League, clubs need to be above suspicion.
The rules on loaned players not being able to play against their 'real` club is an area that is open to miss use.
I`m not saying that there is any wrong doing on the part of Manchester United, but the fact that they have loaned out TWO goalkeepers this season, Tim Howard to Everton and Ben Foster to Watford, who were both regulars for their respective clubs, meant that when they faced Manchester United they did so without their regular goalkeepers.
It just seems a little bizarre; maybe the way forward is to stop clubs from the same division from loaning clubs to each other.
Have your say on the 'Latics Speyk` message board
Vital Wigan is back, so why not join up and join in?
Message Board We also need your help in the forum, so join up and kick off the debate, or if you have a forum at the moment, why not enquire about merging with Vital and get free hosting + an income? To visit the message board, click here. Get involved
This website is your website and we are looking for people to help run the site. Do you go to most of the games and have an opinion? Why not write a match report? Perhaps you are a budding journalist or even just someone who is very opinionated? Well why not join our team? If this interests you please contact Vital Wigan.
Date:Sunday May 6 2007
Meet The Ref - Latics v Birmingham - David Webb (Wednesday August 27 2014)
Latics In Talks With Tours Striker Andy Delort (Tuesday August 26 2014)
Ramis A Step Closer To Deportivo Move (Tuesday August 26 2014)
McArthur In Demand As Leicester Make £5m Bid (Tuesday August 26 2014)
Latics Have Forshaw Bid Accepted By Brentford (Monday August 25 2014)
Oriol Riera Off The Mark (Sunday August 24 2014)
What The Bosses Said - Latics 1 Blackpool 0 (Sunday August 24 2014)
Vote For Your Vital Latics Man Of The Match (Sunday August 24 2014)
Adam Forshaw Transfer Back On? (Sunday August 24 2014)
Nick Powell Set For Latics Return? (Sunday August 24 2014)
|21. Leeds Utd||4||1||0||3||-6||3|
|Disappointed With Cup Loss
» Brentford : 27/08/2014 20:01:00
|LUFC Summer target set for Verona move
» Leeds Utd : 27/08/2014 19:42:00
|Calero Puts Rams Through
» Derby County : 27/08/2014 18:59:00
» Derby County : 27/08/2014 18:57:00
|LUFC BREAKING: Bradford City v Leeds United Teams
» Leeds Utd : 27/08/2014 18:36:00